top of page

PRISM / READING GLASSES

Why I’m cautious with prism glasses (and why I use them selectively)

Prism lenses can be very helpful in the right situation. They can also become an expensive, ongoing workaround that reduces symptoms without improving the underlying visual skills that caused the symptoms in the first place. That’s why, in my practice, prism is a tool, not the default plan.

image.png

What Does Prism Do? 

Prism “moves” where the image lands so the eyes don’t have to work as hard to line up. That can reduce:

​

double vision

pulling/strain

headaches

nausea/dizziness

“eyes can’t keep up”

fatigue at reading/screen distance

 

What prism does not do: it does not train eye teaming, tracking, focusing stamina, or visual processing skills. It’s a compensatory strategy, not skill-building.

​

Because the brain can adapt to prism over time (a known phenomenon in binocular vision), the amount of prism required can change.

Why I dislike prism as a primary plan for children

1. Children’s visual systems are highly adaptable. That’s a good thing for learning, but it can also mean the brain “accepts” prism and doesn’t develop the missing skills as efficiently, especially if the child’s issues are fundamentally developmental (tracking, vergence stamina, accommodative control, visual-motor integration).

​

​

2. For one of the most common scenarios, symptomatic Convergence Insufficiency, a placebo-controlled trial found that base-in prism reading glasses were no more effective than a placebo for symptom improvement in children.

​

That doesn’t mean prism is “bad,” but it does mean: if a child’s issue is skill-based, prism is often not the most direct path to durable improvement.

3. Prism can “quiet” symptoms while school struggles continue

 

This is the part that matters most to families: a child may feel some relief, yet still struggle with:

  • stamina for reading

  • losing place/skipping lines

  • slow, effortful comprehension

  • avoidance behaviors

  • handwriting/spacing issues

  • reduced confidence

​

When the core issue is a functional visual skill deficit, the academic cost can continue, just with a different coping strategy.

​

​

4. Kids change prescriptions. Frames break. Lenses get scratched. Symptoms shift with growth and demands. Prism often means repeat visits + remakes + adjustments over time.

Why I’m cautious with prism for adults
(especially high prism)

Adults are different: prism can be genuinely helpful for certain stable patterns of diplopia and alignment issues, and professional guidance often includes prism as an option for symptomatic diplopia management.

​

I see many adults who arrive in prism with a history that looks like this:

  1. mild symptoms → prism gives relief

  2. more stress/screen time/fatigue → symptoms return

  3. prism is increased → relief again

  4. repeat…

​

This can happen because prism reduces demand, but doesn’t increase capacity (fusional reserves, flexibility, stamina). If the system is decompensating, you can keep “supporting” it without rebuilding it.

A randomized study in young adults with convergence insufficiency found prism lenses reduced symptoms, but did not significantly improve several objective clinical measures (e.g., near point of convergence, fusional vergence), underscoring the “symptom relief vs skill change” gap.

The hidden cost isn’t just money—it’s lifestyle limitation

Compensation vs. Long Term Solutions

Adults with unresolved functional vision issues often compensate by:

  • avoiding night driving

  • limiting screen time (or paying for it afterward)

  • declining promotions or advanced coursework

  • reducing reading for pleasure

  • pushing through headaches and fatigue as “normal”

​

Prism may make this tolerable. But tolerable is not the same as fixed.

When prism is appropriate

(and I will recommend it)

I do use prism when it’s the right tool, especially when the goal is immediate functional relief or when the deviation pattern is not realistically trainable.
Common examples:
  • Acute or unstable diplopia where immediate comfort and safety matter
  • Certain cranial nerve palsies / neurologic causes (often temporary prisms while healing occurs)
  • Stable, long-standing strabismus where prism improves daily function
  • Bridge strategy: short-term prism to reduce symptoms while we address the underlying system through therapy or rehabilitation
​
Prism can be part of a thoughtful plan. The issue is using it as the only plan when the true problem is skill-based.
image.png
image.png

When symptoms persist—especially with reading, attention, headaches, fatigue, dizziness, or avoidance—my preference is:

​

  1. Confirm eye health + prescription (necessary, but not sufficient)

  2. Measure functional vision (teaming, tracking, focusing, stamina, suppression, etc.)

  3. Use the right tool:

    1. lenses when appropriate

    2. targeted therapy/rehab when skills are the limiter

    3. prism only when it truly matches the problem

 

This is also why many patients who were told “everything looks normal” still struggle: a standard exam can miss the functional skill layer that drives day-to-day performance.

“If I already have prism, should I stop wearing it?”

Important: don’t discontinue prism abruptly without clinician guidance, especially if you’ve worn it for a long time or you have constant diplopia.
 
The correct plan may be:
  • keep prism temporarily
  • evaluate underlying function
  • reduce prism strategically if/when the system improves
  • or maintain prism if it’s the best long-term tool for your pattern

We Stand Behind Our Care

We don’t just “support” symptoms—we work to change the system.
 

That’s why we offer a money-back guarantee when attendance and home program requirements are met (details are provided in your program agreement).


Most workarounds can’t offer that, because they aren’t designed to create lasting change.

bottom of page